Being compliant isn't just about reading and following the regs. It's about balancing business and regulatory expectations with the needs of the people involved. Good compliance is about leadership. And the smart executive can turn good compliance into competitive advantage. So what's stopping you?
One hurdle might be the need for constant consensus. It's something we've all fallen prey to at times in our careers. But eventually, the need for mutual support and approval can lead to doubt suppression, illusory assumption sharing, and
premature consensus.
Ultimately, this
results in disastrous decisions, especially when dealing with FDA
compliance and quality systems.
Six tips can help:
1. Encourage skepticism.
For any significant decision, ask your colleagues or staff to identify
at least two reasonable conditions under which a particular choice your team faces
might result in failure. When I advise Quality Systems and Regulatory Affairs teams on lean compliance, I suggest they use the "2% rule" to define "reasonable." In other words, for something to be reasonable, there has to be a 2% or greater chance of it working, occurring, etc. It's a great rule-of-thumb for figuring out where to draw the line when it comes to how much risk assessment is enough.
2. Allow freewheeling discussions.
Talking in a group under strict rules and
protocols can inhibit the greater intelligence of group thinking; informality
can encourage the expression of doubts and ideas.
In a regular staff meeting, you might want to stick to the agenda to keep things focused on action items. However, for reviewing open items and trying to come to conclusions, this is the way. Even in staff meetings, consider leaving some time at the end of the meeting to raise open issues. 15 minutes can more than suffice to simply raise the issue and get input. Save the decision-making for later.
3. Foster a “third way.”
Keep an eye on group dynamics—when polarization threatens, push the two
“right” and “wrong” decisions off the table and force your team to identify at
least three unorthodox options that might work.
This can be a painful moment for many quality and regulatory professionals who have that "black and white" mentality. You may be surprised at how little they will contribute ... until they see that the unorthodox options actually work.
4. Restate conclusions.
It may seem obvious, but this is so often forgotten in the heat of the moment. Summarize any discussions along with any “to-do’s” for various
individuals. It’s one thing to agree
with something in a meeting; it’s another if you end up tasked with it.
For leaders, this is a good way to closeout any meeting. Years ago, I worked for a boss whom I'll call Brent. He and I did not see eye to eye most of the time. However, he did observe something about my meeting style that, while I didn't like it at the time, I've since realized was extremely accurate and helpful. I rarely ever ended a meeting by summarizing what each person was supposed to "go do" and get done before the next meeting. As a result, I spent a lot of time chasing down my staff to clarify deliverables; my staff started to get resentful, thinking they'd left the meeting with 3 things to do only to find out they actually 4 ... or 2. When I changed that, and ended every meeting with a summary list of all the things each participant was going to go do, productivity and morale went up almost immediately. Thank you to Brent for this advice.
5. Sleep on it.
For
particularly challenging decisions, break off discussion before consensus and
have everyone “sleep on it” for a day.
Pushing against an artificial deadline can create unintended resistance,
miss midnight inspirations, or erode trust.
Unless you’re an emergency room physician, you always have the option of
delaying for a day. This includes responding to FDA 483s. Your response isn't due now - it's due 15 working days from now. And make sure to get that response done at least a day early so you and your team can sleep on it.
6. Just say "Why."
This is one that I admit I learned from my wife. And over the years, it's worked wonderfully in work settings. Consider
laying down a “Just Saying ‘No’ Isn’t Allowed” ground rule. Anyone voicing their resistance to an idea or
choice must state their logic AND provide at least one reasonable
alternative. So if your question is,
“Are we ready to submit this NDA?” and someone says No, that person needs to provide
their reasoning along with reasonable steps to be taken (including in a
reasonable timeframe) to get the NDA ready for submission.
Each of these tips will help you improve your ability to achieve compliance and business flexibility. That's the role of a good leader and the path to success.
Are you ready?